I think this goes before committee in February. I think it will pass.
I hope it does too. Then maybe my neighbor would quit calling the sherriff every time I run out a 30 round mag from the AR on an armadillo in the yard.
I think this goes before committee in February. I think it will pass.
I hope it does too. Then maybe my neighbor would quit calling the sherriff every time I run out a 30 round mag from the AR on an armadillo in the yard.
Here is a NO vote. Humans are, already, supposed to be the smartest critters in the woods. And, there are other ways to protect your hearing. If you need multipal shots, spend the $200 tax on ammo and practice.
To bad they don't make suppressors for shotguns since that would probably be the main hunting gun where a person would take multiple shots.
I'm really not sure what point you are trying to make.First of all I don't want to be on the receiving end of someone elses muzzle as the example you give of being down range.Secondly we are talking about using a suppressor for a hunting situation not target shooting.In nearly all hunting situations people are not going to be shooting at the ranges you stated. I have several friends that use them to hunt with in other states and they all tell me the report is next to nothing.I'm not trying to argue about it but just want clarification on how much they would help me in a hunting situation. I don't want to be misinformed as I have never used one either.They would have to be better than nothing.
Scott
I can't believe the amount of misinformation and straight up FUDD in this thread.
Funny the amount of name calling in this thread. Quiet/loud who cares. I really don't think this a time that we should be busting ourselves up into groups as firearms owners.
A suppressor/sub-sonic ammo combo is void of any significant db level. Anyone wanting to save their ears can benefit from a suppressor and my personal experience with sub-ammo is shot placement equals kill.