Should Congress Reinstate the AWB

[jsl_pt]

7 yes votes now???? Geeze!

 

[ohms]

Bill O Reilly is one of those uneducated douche heads. He equated buying an AK with buying a real bazooka the other night. Its not just libs that are ignorant and want to limit our freedoms. The enemy is on both sides.

http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/07/25...er-calls-for-more-gun-control-misinformation/

Thanks uncle ted

 

[Mr.357Sig]

Now it's seven in favor. I think I smell some trolls...

 

[shooterdave]

Well crap... I voted yes just to be a **** and spoil the shutout... I guess I should have looked at the poll results first...

 

[AKguy1985]

Actually? No. The reason FUDD's have a stereotype is because a sizeable percentage of them fit the mold. I enjoy shooting skeet and hunting quail also, but some of the guys who embody those sports are elitist pr!cks. Their flavor of firearm is just fine, but mine should be banned in their eyes.

I have no use for them whatsoever. :finger:

Thats what i was talking about.

 

[jsl_pt]

Any that voted yes sincerely feel free to
Give me any of your assault rifles to clear your conscious of having any of the evil weapons of destruction . I'd be glad to help out.

 

[dennishoddy]

3 people voted yes. Must be skeet shooters or quail hunters.

Well crap. I guess I'll have to sell my dog, SXS shotguns, and stay with the AR to be credible in your version?
All skeet shooters and quail hunters fall into this catagory?
Pheasant hunters and trap shooters are ok then?
Deer hunters? Where do they fit into this?

 

[beast1989]

Mr. 357sig i cannot agree with you more, i cannot believe that 4 people on this site voted yes, i am a LEO and i have been asked several times if i would enforce another AWB and i can tell you right now i swore to protect the Constitution of the United States, and the laws of this great state, which means i swore to protect "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". to me that means no laws of any kind on any weapon, and yes my belief will have people hate me and say things and may even have some on this site try to combat my views, but tell me what part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is not understandable and i will talk about changing my views.

Man I wish most people had the same mindset.

One of the things that irks me the most is when you bring a logical argument to the table and people don't even have a reasonable rebuttal, instead they just put up this massive wall of indoctrinated ignorance which makes NO sense at all. If they would actually think through those beliefs they would realize how backwards those beliefs are.

 

[Glocktogo]

Well crap. I guess I'll have to sell my dog, SXS shotguns, and stay with the AR to be credible in your version?
All skeet shooters and quail hunters fall into this catagory?
Pheasant hunters and trap shooters are ok then?
Deer hunters? Where do they fit into this?

I'm not AKguy, but he agreed with my assessment. Not all, just a sizable percentage. Every multi-use gun club has a segment that are elitist a-holes that think what they do is OK, but what others do with their guns isn't. I'm not stereotyping when I say that numerous gun clubs across the nation have trouble with the "shotgunners" attempting to control how others use the non-shotgun ranges and what types of guns are allowed at the club. All you have to do is show up with a "tactical" shotgun at an organized skeet or sporting clays event to see it in action. Some of them have gone so far as to support legislation that restricts the ownership and use of firearms they deem undesirable.

I fully support the guns and activities that utilize their type of firearms. I think they're a quality use of one's time and money. I think introducing others and youth to these activities and guns has a positive benefit for the individuals and their communities.

I simply wish they'd have enough respect for my rights to do likewise.

 

[Lurker66]

Ahhhhh...

Come on Lurker. You voted. Ya know ya did.

Wolfie, i just voted no. Im hopelessly addicted to my guns.