Sry if my quoting you seemed like I was being argumentative; wasn't intending so. I was really just speaking to the situation more than your quote.
As for the difference, "but he gassed his own people" was used to kill 1 million people in Iraq including 6k plus Americans. It also costed 1 Trillion dollars. We can't solve all the world's problems and when we kill 54 million infants at home "legally", how does that then justify us spending 1 Trillion dollars to secure foreign borders (instead of our own) and killing 1000x the civilians in a war we start make up for a few people being gassed by their own leader? I doubt Assad even did it as he had NOTHING to gain by it. But even if he did, being Al Queda's air force is wrong...you know it and I know it. Assad is indirectly much more in line with western values than the people we are helping by attacking him. If the head choppers were trying to overthrow our gov't here, then 7yrs into the civil war I'd probably not be so concerned if Trump used gas on them too so my daughters could have the right to live more freely and drive and go to college rather than be sex slaves with their genitals cut off by the radical muslims. That is a LOT of difference to answer your question.
I, too, shall speak to the situation:
First off, we didn't start any wars in the Middle East. Sodamn Hinsane overran an ally and the Taliban harbored Al Qaeda who attacked us. We simply engaged the enemy where he lived in order to prevent further death and destruction over here. That would include protecting your daughters' right to live freely and drive and go to college rather than be sex slaves with their genitals cut off by radical Muslims.
Being Al Qaeda's air force would be wrong if it were true.
Since when is gassing your own people - directly or indirectly - a Western value? How about dictatorship, despotism and tyranny?
Equating the mass murder of our children by abortion to what we spend in efforts to protect our country is a non sequitur. If what we spend to use force for our protection took funds away from ending abortion, you'd have a valid point.
Two things we can agree on, however, is the lack of security on our borders (which is now being addressed and rectified), and the fact that nothing can justify the killing of the millions of our unborn youth to date and likely in the future.
Woody