They’re gonna make it rough on you porn addicts.

[TANSTAAFL]

Banning? I am not for banning anything. When it comes to kids though we really need to develop a system that does not create a registry, confirms age, or allows with parental permission. Also with porn it has progressed to far more shameful acts than were found in Playboy or Hustler 30 years ago.

It's not about banning the material, it's more about protecting children from things they are not mentally or socially ready for. As for child pornography, absolutely, since it infringes upon a child's right to be free of exploitation from negative forces.

 

[2busy]

So VCR is making a comeback

 

[RockHopper]

Banning? I am not for banning anything. When it comes to kids though we really need to develop a system that does not create a registry, confirms age, or allows with parental permission. Also with porn it has progressed to far more shameful acts than were found in Playboy or Hustler 30 years ago.

It's not about banning the material, it's more about protecting children from things they are not mentally or socially ready for. As for child pornography, absolutely, since it infringes upon a child's right to be free of exploitation from negative forces.

There is no "system fix". Neither legal nor software. It's a Parental responsibility. The end.

 

[turkeyrun]

I am all for banning;

1. Safety warning labels. Stupid should hurt. Remove them from the gene pool, not allow them to procreate more stupid.

2. Safety lockouts. See #1. More and more items are being rendered near useless because of these stupid switches.

 

[bushmaster06]

Banning? I am not for banning anything. When it comes to kids though we really need to develop a system that does not create a registry, confirms age, or allows with parental permission. Also with porn it has progressed to far more shameful acts than were found in Playboy or Hustler 30 years ago.

It's not about banning the material, it's more about protecting children from things they are not mentally or socially ready for. As for child pornography, absolutely, since it infringes upon a child's right to be free of exploitation from negative forces.

So parental responsibility?

 

[XYZ]

I’m just sitting here thinking about how long this porno, in various forms, has been going on.

 

[dennishoddy]

Don't forget about grabbing a beer out of the shop fridge.

My dad made home brew when growing up. There were cases of it stacked up in the basement.
Easy pickings.

 

[dennishoddy]

We as Americans should not be banning anything. We have to right to live and pursuit of happiness. It’s not my or your or anyone’s business to be telling others what they should or should not be doing. This is why our country is in hell atm.
just because you think it’s unhealthy does not mean we should ban it much less criminally charge the ppl. I’m betting most of you who are calling for bans is over weight.
Should we ban food? No. Should we criminally charge you? No. We all agree guns do not kill ppl. The bullets do, I mean ppl do.
We agree we shouldn’t ban them. If someone wants an addiction let them have it. Their choice. Let natural selection take its course. If we do that like we did 100+ years ago, the world would be.maybe better?

The problem with allowing addictions of choice is that those with those addictions can interfere with the rights of those folks that aren’t addicted to drugs/alcohol. They can’t support themselves or the price of their addictions by working so they resort to theft of personal property that hard working people earned by the sweat of their brow.
There is no denying it nor trying to reason out of the facts that addiction leads to criminal behavior by looking at those states that allow it that are turning into criminal shat holes.
We have members on board that left their homes from there with first hand experience.
This is a nation of laws which the founders hoped would protect the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Surely they didn’t mean a drug addict could steal and commit other crimes in the process to find their “happiness”?

 

[dennishoddy]

I’m just sitting here thinking about how long this porno, in various forms, has been going on.

Look at the Sistine chapel in Italy. Full of nekkid women. The ancient Greeks loved their nekkid statues.
It’s been around forever.

 

[Beautiful Mulberry]

The problem with allowing addictions of choice is that those with those addictions can interfere with the rights of those folks that aren’t addicted to drugs/alcohol. They can’t support themselves or the price of their addictions by working so they resort to theft of personal property that hard working people earned by the sweat of their brow.
There is no denying it nor trying to reason out of the facts that addiction leads to criminal behavior by looking at those states that allow it that are turning into criminal shat holes.
We have members on board that left their homes from there with first hand experience.
This is a nation of laws which the founders hoped would protect the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Surely they didn’t mean a drug addict could steal and commit other crimes in the process to find their “happiness”?

I agree.
I thinks that where natural selection takes place. More ppl need to defend themselves from these type of ppl without repercussions from the law.