We can argue the loss of tactical surprise..
We can argue that it scares the sheep.
We can argue that it will teach citizens that their armed brethren are self reliant, law abiding citizens as they see it more and more.
We can argue till the sun goes down about what ever anyone wants to argue re: OC
Whether you agree or disagree with OC: what cannot be argued is that in a land with a government established by the people with the primary purpose of protecting the rights of those same people that taking the choice to OC away from free and law abiding citizens is an abhorrent and evil thing.
It is absolutely amazing to me that anyone who believes in freedom and the right to keep and bear arms could argue otherwise.
Thank you. My version wasn't going to be as good, or nice.