In OK you only have to show your CCW to a LEO if you are armed at the time of contact. That in and of itself is reason enough to keep the DL and CCW seperate.
I agree 100%. Nobody elses business.
In OK you only have to show your CCW to a LEO if you are armed at the time of contact. That in and of itself is reason enough to keep the DL and CCW seperate.
In OK you only have to show your CCW to a LEO if you are armed at the time of contact. That in and of itself is reason enough to keep the DL and CCW seperate.
Not so; see the statute.Werewolf said:In OK you only have to show your CCW to a LEO if you are armed at the time of contact. That in and of itself is reason enough to keep the DL and CCW seperate.
O.S. 21 §,Section 1290.8 - Possession of License Required - Notification to Police of Gun
POSSESSION OF LICENSE REQUIRED
NOTIFICATION TO POLICE OF GUN
B. The person shall be required to have possession of his or her valid handgun license and a valid Oklahoma driver license or an Oklahoma State photo identification at all times when in possession of an authorized pistol.
^^That endorsement would be on the back. Most people look on the front to make sure info is correct, not on the back.I personally have no problems with people knowing that I'm packing. What's the big deal. I see no issues with it.
Talked to an OCSO deputy at church this am.
My Question: If you pull me over, I'm not carrying so only give my DL, can you tell if I have an SDA Permit?
His Answer: Yes, when I run your DL, it will flash it at the top of my screen.
My Response: So, then why do you think they have two cards since you know anyway?
His Answer: Because some other law enforcement agencies don't have access to the same information in their squad car and would have to call dispatch for that info.
He seems to think that in the next couple of years smaller agencies will gain that access but for now it's needed bc not call have a system capable of that.
Enter your email address to join: