That's your choice to believe what you want. Right?So the answer is no. Doesn't mean that they the district is fantastic, but the answer is still no then.
That's your choice to believe what you want. Right?So the answer is no. Doesn't mean that they the district is fantastic, but the answer is still no then.
So again to be clear, the answer is no then and you (yes you the nearly omniscient Dennis Hoddy) can find no supporting evidence to the claim that there are litter boxes being installed for furriest at an Oklahoma school district. Come on man, give me a bite of anything substantive, I know you love proving me wrong.That's your choice to believe what you want. Right?
Never said there was did I? Why are you making up stuff? I only posted a link to a perv that was covered up by the school board. Nothing else, no comments, nothing.So again to be clear, the answer is no then and you (yes you the nearly omniscient Dennis Hoddy) can find no supporting evidence to the claim that there are litter boxes being installed for furriest at an Oklahoma school district. Come on man, give me a bite of anything substantive, I know you love proving me wrong.
I say "Hrmmm" to someone else's comment, you post an article which, although related in that it shows the district is not as pure as fallen snow, does not relate to the point of the thread about litter boxes. You used that to indicate you wouldn't put the other stuff past them (which refutes the "Nothing else, no comments, nothing" statement incidentally). Then you haven't just said "no" to the question of if there are any substantive articles about that topic, or posted one to prove me wrong (which again, I know is your favorite).Never said there was did I? Why are you making up stuff? I only posted a link to a perv that was covered up by the school board. Nothing else, no comments, nothing.
Why are you making up this narrative? You're attacking me for posting that? Why?
Nice try. Total fail.I say "Hrmmm" to someone else's comment, you post an article which, although related in that it shows the district is not as pure as fallen snow, does not relate to the point of the thread about litter boxes. You used that to indicate you wouldn't put the other stuff past them (which refutes the "Nothing else, no comments, nothing" statement incidentally). Then you haven't just said "no" to the question of if there are any substantive articles about that topic, or posted one to prove me wrong (which again, I know is your favorite).
That is not an attack. But I like how you pivot to a victimhood thing like it is. The topic of the thread is those litter boxes, and not the other sins and transgressions of the district.
Here...I got you this to look in.Nice try. Total fail.
Enter your email address to join: