Sure there is. We have rapid instances of child removal. Yes, some times it may not be done properly, but why not fix that instead of how we continue to whine about everything. The idea of more people fighting back would reduce the events just doesn't carry water. None of these folks are rational enough to understand that concept. We're not talking about the convenience store robber, or the irate neighbor, etc. We are dealing with folks that have lost contact with the real world. Houston is not a "gun controlled environment" and they just had another of these events today. Those folks in the grocery store had their rights greatly restricted. Improvement is possible.For one, there is no such thing as "rapid" due process. Second, the only way you could ensure that the proposed bad guy doesn't lose his guns before the hearing is to arrest them, or remove the firearms from their possession, and we would be back to square one.
I get what you are saying, but there is no viable way to make a red flag law viable without infringing on the rights of the accused. Instead of arguing over this point, lets fight to remove state government laws that restrict people from carrying for self protection. When more people fight back, there will be less mass shooters. Is it any wonder that 99.99% of all mass shootings happen in heavily gun controlled environments?