One of these days, we are going to discover that we do not have the answers to every question.
"Posts from several members who have had conversations with him...." I guess several is up for interpretation. But I call BS on that quoted statement if several is more than 3 having conversations with him.No, but I believe from reading posts from several OSA members who have had conversations with him about the newbies posting in classifieds issue that he is well aware of the practice and member opinions and has chosen to leave it as it is.
No; not everybody.Everybody was quick to throw money to support the site without asking for change.
JMO.
Everybody that I am referring to in my statement did. It is not inclusive of every member.No; not everybody.
Everybody that I am referring to in my statement did. It is not inclusive of every member.
True.Well, fine then. It's not required anyway.
"Posts from several members who have had conversations with him...." I guess several is up for interpretation. But I call BS on that quoted statement if several is more than 3 having conversations with him.
Does conversation require response from the other party? It seems that it would.Conversations that I am referring to in my statement are not limited to audio conversations, but also email conversations. It is inclusive of more than spoken word.
Enter your email address to join: