I never made that argument.I love the "Why do you need that" argument...
You think your AR is an assault weapon ... seriously .... HAHAHAHAYou want name-calling, how about this one - you're posts in this thread have all been extremely anti-"Assault weapon" and that quite frankly, is anti-gun.
Just good memory - when somebody steps over civil lines even on the internet it sticks out.You haven't been around long enough to see me do much of anything - you've been here a year - and I'm less than impressed with the fact that you're somehow stalking me through my posts.
I define hunting rifle as anything that spits a bullet. And that's what you do when you compare stuff - you try to make it equal.No one brought up "equivalent" gun - that's a crap argument since ARs aren't at all like bolt-action guns. Why does an AR have to be equivalent to what you define as a "hunting rifle" for it to be used in an argument.
I choose to ignore it - because you can hunt squirrels with rimfire.Again - I brought up the fact that there are other things to hunt here than deer - you don't seem to have a snappy comeback about how you read that part of my post because you choose to keep ignoring it because it invalidates your argument.
22" to 16" loss was 8% .... what's your point again?Please read the link I posted with actual facts specific to .223 and barrel differences.