LOL Sig 556 not on Feinstein's ban list

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Drebin

Sharpshooter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Location
Sand Springs
Wonder how much rifles like the HK SL8 will appreciate...?

It has a thumbhole stock, a barrel shroud and accepts mags over 10 rounds.

None of this matters anyway because it won't pass. If it did it's still unconstitutional so it's irrelevant. This is all a big show to make us look like the dumb bad guys and drum up anti-gun support. It mostly seems to have backfired (hopefully) with the public. I think the anti-gunners out right now were mostly always that way and are just working overtime to be louder than the normal people.
 

sh00ter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
4,603
Reaction score
3,203
Location
Twilight Zone
It has a thumbhole stock, a barrel shroud and accepts mags over 10 rounds.

None of this matters anyway because it won't pass. If it did it's still unconstitutional so it's irrelevant. This is all a big show to make us look like the dumb bad guys and drum up anti-gun support. It mostly seems to have backfired (hopefully) with the public. I think the anti-gunners out right now were mostly always that way and are just working overtime to be louder than the normal people.

And the Constitution is only the 1st line of defense...even with no second amendment, all of us have a natural right to keep and bear arms just as men have done since the beginning of time. Whether it be for self defense, hunting, etc...doesn't matter, it is a universal right to have weapons, but mostly for protection. People in other countries that can't own fire arms are "subjects" and are defenseless against a gas chamber.
 

Mr10mm

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
5
Location
GANGLAND
It has a thumbhole stock, a barrel shroud and accepts mags over 10 rounds.

None of this matters anyway because it won't pass. If it did it's still unconstitutional so it's irrelevant. This is all a big show to make us look like the dumb bad guys and drum up anti-gun support. It mostly seems to have backfired (hopefully) with the public. I think the anti-gunners out right now were mostly always that way and are just working overtime to be louder than the normal people.

Only going to mention one, but where you born after 2004? Unconstitutional? Ha maybe in your and my eyes but they pushed an AWB in 1994. Not even going into 1934, 68, 86, 89 issues.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom