Michelle Obama’s warning to gun owners

[dowmace]

You guys talking about "civil war" and what you would do if they "came to take your guns" really make me laugh. Are you REALLY going to shoot it out with LEOs and the military, I mean are you REALLY going to do that? Most likely, hell no you are not, for all your keyboard blustering. You and your tricked out AR-15 and your super duper plastic 9mm going to do battle with SAWs and Apache helicopters. LMFAO

Instead of engaging in this ridiculous fantasy, why don't you spend your time working for pro-2A candidates? Or doesn't that have the same sex appeal as "from my cold dead hands?"

I doubt they are going to be sending any Apaches to retrieve my measly collection but I will absolutely put my life on the line to stop someone from taking what is mine Leo or not.

How do you know I'm not doing my part for the pro 2A movement?

What are YOU doing for the 2A movement?

 

[tsmithwick]

You guys talking about "civil war" and what you would do if they "came to take your guns" really make me laugh. Are you REALLY going to shoot it out with LEOs and the military, I mean are you REALLY going to do that? Most likely, hell no you are not, for all your keyboard blustering. You and your tricked out AR-15 and your super duper plastic 9mm going to do battle with SAWs and Apache helicopters. LMFAO

Instead of engaging in this ridiculous fantasy, why don't you spend your time working for pro-2A candidates? Or doesn't that have the same sex appeal as "from my cold dead hands?"

How many military and law enforcement will go with these laws if passed? Last time I checked most of the socialist Neanderthals cant even shoot a gun much less flight and kill with an apache. And if I did happen I’m not going to directly fight unless necessary I’m going to get out and take out some of the problem with a sniper rifle. The type of people who would do these followers would break apart like a clay pigeon after several of the heads were killed off.

 

[Super Dave]

You guys talking about "civil war" and what you would do if they "came to take your guns" really make me laugh. Are you REALLY going to shoot it out with LEOs and the military, I mean are you REALLY going to do that? Most likely, hell no you are not, for all your keyboard blustering. You and your tricked out AR-15 and your super duper plastic 9mm going to do battle with SAWs and Apache helicopters. LMFAO

Instead of engaging in this ridiculous fantasy, why don't you spend your time working for pro-2A candidates? Or doesn't that have the same sex appeal as "from my cold dead hands?"

Don't be ridiculous, my well dressed legal eagle. I'll be using a steel .45acp and a .308. Everybody knows 9mm and .223 is for bitches.

Seriously though! If you guys really want to do good, JB is right. We need to help the candidates that will help us. But first we need to listen to old Willy S. when he said, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." They are bad. Not good. Bad.

JB?

 

[Biggsly]

Instead of engaging in this ridiculous fantasy, why don't you spend your time working for pro-2A candidates? Or doesn't that have the same sex appeal as "from my cold dead hands?"

Do they get any more pro-gun then the Obamas?.............................................

 

[JB Books]

Don't be ridiculous, my well dressed legal eagle. I'll be using a steel .45acp and a .308. Everybody knows 9mm and .223 is for bitches.

Seriously though! If you guys really want to do good, JB is right. We need to help the candidates that will help us. But first we need to listen to old Willy S. when he said, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." They are bad. Not good. Bad.

JB?

Just shoot straight.

 

[AKguy1985]

guerilla warfare like in viet nam worked pretty well for the VC.

 

[VladdDImpaler]

You guys talking about "civil war" and what you would do if they "came to take your guns" really make me laugh. Are you REALLY going to shoot it out with LEOs and the military, I mean are you REALLY going to do that? Most likely, hell no you are not, for all your keyboard blustering. You and your tricked out AR-15 and your super duper plastic 9mm going to do battle with SAWs and Apache helicopters. LMFAO

Instead of engaging in this ridiculous fantasy, why don't you spend your time working for pro-2A candidates? Or doesn't that have the same sex appeal as "from my cold dead hands?"

I'd be willing to bet the Tories said something similar to Patriots from 1765-1775. The Tories got their answer on April 19, 1775.

 

[Weatherby]

The voice of reason drowned out by the rattle of empty cans. The OSA way.

 

[Super Dave]

Just shoot straight.

Not you, JB. We can't get rid of you. You're... special.

Now please put your Boss Hog avatar back up. It makes me happy.

As they say in the Tulsa area, "Down with the man, up with the trees!" Everybody knows the first part is implied. You go, Tulsa!

BTW, I'll be in Sapulpa this evening, watching our team get stomped, if anybody cares to buy me a sandwich.

 

[henschman]

I am sure that many of you actually would take up arms if outright gun confiscation were ever attempted... or at least would refuse to turn in guns and would possibly resist with force if you ever caught any heat for it. I would be right there with you. But here's the deal: the politicians know this too. That is why outright confiscation has never been tried in this country, and never will be tried. The politicians are smart enough to know that it would likely be met with some resistance. The way it will go, if we keep on our present course toward a statist society, is that the politicians will keep on making small incremental infringements on our right to bear arms (along with our other liberties). No single infringement will be so outrageous or hard to swallow that anyone will be willing to draw the line right there and wage war against the government over it.

Look at all the gun control that has been passed so far in this country... it is very incremental. First they require registration and a tax stamp on certain types of weapons that are fairly rare, and then 50-some years later they close the registry on them, making them de-facto illegal, yet without having to confiscate a single gun. They require dealer licensure and ban mail-order sales other than through dealers. They cut off the further import or production of certain ammo types, and then certain guns with certain features. They impose little requirements that at first are more annoying than anything, like the background check requirement. They drive up prices by refusing to sell surplus gov't ammo and firearms on the market, and block the importation of certain guns from foreign countries. They make administrative regulations that never have to see a vote, and use them to further restrict the importation and sale of certain guns and ammo. They impose environmental regulations on bullets and components.

Nobody resisted any of these incremental infringements along the way, because it was never a "big enough deal" to warrant that in anyone's mind. It has to be a pretty damn "big deal" for someone to actually give up his entire life, standard of living, and everything he loves about it; condemning himself to be hunted as an outlaw for the rest of his likely much-shortened life, to take the lives of his fellow countrymen and make widows and orphans of their wives and kids.

The politicians know that they do not have to outright confiscate any guns... all they have to do is to slowly make it more expensive and more of a hassle to own and shoot one, and eventually we will get the same place -- which is a disarmed populace and an armed government. Also, the government will certainly be expanding in other ways, and making people more dependent on it. Eventually we will reach a point where the vast majority of people draw some sort of government paycheck... hell, we are pretty close to that already. If you depend on the government for your job, food, medicine, housing, and other basic needs of life, you will be in much less of a position to fight them. Only people who are materially and mentally independent are threats to a tyrannical government. If you make people materially dependent on the government, they will become mentally dependent. Nobody will adopt a political/moral philosophy that is opposed to big government when their livelihood depends on big government. If the attitude in this country becomes more and more tolerant of big government in other parts of our life, eventually people will give up on the idea that they need to be armed in order to protect themselves against tyranny. Once we've reached that point, as all other countries already have, we will be ready for european/soviet/nazi style mass disarmament.

So you see, it's bigger than just gun control. The problem is the failure of most people in our society to adopt a consistently pro-liberty view on all other issues as well. And that is what will have to change if we are to retain a shred of our rightful liberty.