I don't like free stuff, just reasonably priced stuff.
I think wanting competition and lower prices is a very capitalist thing to do.
Also, i don't support "free healthcare" just a national health insurance plan to pay for it. Providing the indigent with health insurance.
Oh
yeah? I seem to recall a nifty pistol a couple days ago listed for $1.00 that y'all was saying was way overpriced and undesirable.
I don't think people want free, but they don't want to pay more than it is worth. I seen a used PSA upper on here a while back. The seller at that time was asking more then PSA wanted for a new one with free shipping. I never ***** about it, because I don't need to be buying anything anyway. I just move on. It does get old when you see the same add posted over, and over, and over, and over.......
This this would create neither a competitive environment for price competition and it's definitely not capitalism.
And it does sound like you want someone else to pay for it.
Oh
I thought it was a typo with $1000 being the right price.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Suuuuure ya did...
That's my story and I'm stikin' with it!
Actually, I'm young and healthy. Most my premiums would be going to fund the healthcare of the older, less healthy folks. I've probably been to the doctor less than a half dozen times in my life, most of that when I was a kid.
It's kinda like social security. I mean, social security is just a socialized 401k. National health insurance is better for the entire economy.
In the end, you have to subsidize everyone that goes to the emergency room without health insurance anyway. By having a national insurance, not only would you get a better value for your money, but free preventative healthcare will help unclog our emergency rooms.
You couldn't achieve a true free market system while requiring hospitals to treat folks regardless of ability to pay.
Similar threads
