For those who training
Again, far-reaching scenarios that have such a low statistical occurrence, yet they keep being brought up as common-place situations.
See I knew LEOs carrying rifles was nothing new.
I agree with training, essential to most any profession.I'm more for training for everything, and only having to use some, then training for some and wishing I had trained for everything
Did anyone shoot their carbine? Since probably not, then you're proving my point.1. We were dispatched to a domestic violence call in the Southern end of the county. Suspect was heavily armed with SKS and hunting rifles. Shots had been fired by suspect at victim. Suspect is a known survivalist. Suspect went into hiding in the woods and had threatened a shootout if LE did not leave the area. Perimeter was setup approximately 1 sq mile area that was heavily wooded in center, but large open field areas on border of perimeter. Rifle is/was better choice of tool to use.
2. Dispatched to a manhunt. Suspect was armed with long rifle in marijuana field surrounded by heavily wooded area. Suspect was mexican national who had threatened shootout. Perimeter ~1 sq mile, same situation with open areas around woods. Again, rifle is most adequate tool to use.
That good enough for you?
It's un-American not to.So you're giving Eli grief about his rig being "overboard" but yet you're arming yourself in case zombies attack you??
Ask your boy Obama, he seems to be on this nuclear track.These situations might happen every once in a while, but they DO happen. What difference does it make how often it happens? The US Military has plans in case foreign powers start lobbing missiles our way, now according to your principle they should just shut down the defense systems and forget it because they are such a low statistical occurrence...right?
Crimanals don't care what the police carry, they see the police as an enemy, period. That is the most asnine situation you could conjure up! Is this what law enforcement is sitting around in meetings dreaming up?Would that .0001% number rise if criminals knew cops couldn't or wouldn't carry rifles? Probably.
Hypothetical situation here. You become Governor and pass a law saying Police officers are only allowed to carry basic pistols and shotguns. Then you are taken hostage and driven to a big house in the country where the hostage takers say give me 1 million dollars and let my friend Billy Bob out of jail or I'm gonna kill a hostage every 30 minutes. You are the only hostage and your 3 captors are equipped with high power rifles and loaded down with extra mags. You know SWAT is at least 45 minutes out, how would you feel then?
I'm a taxpayer, enough said.What are your qualifications
Cousin Sean to Fitzy in "The Departed"he isn't a cop....
You know you're not supposed to stand in front of the microwave while it's on right?
You are talking in circles. You did in fact state SWAT cops can have ARs but street cops shouldn't. Then you again stated that street cops should have less firepower available to them but yet you felt the need to upgrade to an even heavier caliber. You also stated you look to the future but want examples of the past. So I will ask again since you missed it the first time... What are your qualifications that you think qualifies you to make equipment choices and training suggestions for police officers? I assume you are highly trained and experienced yourself since it is acceptable for you to be armed with a 308 rifle while street cops can only have pistols.
Cool factor is also a good reason to have them, nothing wrong with appeasing the cool factor.
Enter your email address to join: