You should quit thinking.
So would that be like doing two chics at the same time?
Good question.
How about this legal gymnastics conundrum...
Group of people is stranded in cave, on island, etc. Very little to no food. They all agree that one of them will have to die and be eaten by the others, for any of them to have a chance at survival. They all consent to this in writing, fully informed. They draw straws, then kill and eat the one with the short straw. Later, some of them are rescued. Are they guilty of murder? If yes, *should* they be? There are cases where this has actually happened.
How about this legal gymnastics conundrum...
Group of people is stranded in cave, on island, etc. Very little to no food. They all agree that one of them will have to die and be eaten by the others, for any of them to have a chance at survival. They all consent to this in writing, fully informed. They draw straws, then kill and eat the one with the short straw. Later, some of them are rescued. Are they guilty of murder? If yes, *should* they be? There are cases where this has actually happened.
Ah, the case of the Speluncean Explorers.
To keep this OSA-related, Mr. Short Straw would taste like bacon.
To keep this OSA-related, Mr. Short Straw would taste like bacon.
Sorta. Google Chang and Eng Bunker.
Did they spawn Archie?
OK, the speluncean explorers' case is hypothetical:
http://www.nullapoena.de/stud/explorers.html
But I believe something similar has actually happened, IIRC.
OK, the speluncean explorers' case is hypothetical:
http://www.nullapoena.de/stud/explorers.html
But I believe something similar has actually happened, IIRC.
Could be...
I say one framed the other... So that one would be put to death and they can cut him off.. literally.. Then he will truly be free...
The other one would probably be considered an accomplice. Or, he might testify against the other and get immunity.
New question: At which body part are the aforementioned twins attached?
Similar threads
