No sir. A third party is casting your vote for the candidate or option you feel best about.A third party vote is like throwing your voice over the cliff.
No sir. A third party is casting your vote for the candidate or option you feel best about.A third party vote is like throwing your voice over the cliff.
I think we're pretty close on this point but I personally think it's much more that people get comfortable with incumbents. Not that they think it's rigged (at that level). Because it's much easier to be lazy and just kind of go with it. Same reason I hate that our state has a party line vote option. There should be NO party line option. If someone wants to vote all Rep or all Dem then sure. But the pure laziness of just hitting a check box is disgraceful considering it's like 7 seconds to hit all the checkboxes on the ballot.I think it is less a case of being "rigged but more a case of voters not taking the time to actually learn about the incumbent and challengers. Far too many folks believe that elections are "rigged" so why bother.
It's the same principle of rooting against things. Like I don't give too much of a crap about NFL but I'll always root against the Pats. I don't watch MLB but I'll always root against the Yankees. People get motivated by spite or by wanting the fight much easier than wanting the feel good thing. It's why most wars are always rooted in dividing people into sides.Maybe. Not an angle I’ve considered much.
It's the same principle of rooting against things. Like I don't give too much of a crap about NFL but I'll always root against the Pats. I don't watch MLB but I'll always root against the Yankees. People get motivated by spite or by wanting the fight much easier than wanting the feel good thing. It's why most wars are always rooted in dividing people into sides.
That concept can have two sides.
Those that are elected in perpetuity like Mitch McConnel or our own Inhofe hold important positions in DC can direct money and support to things like Tinker AFB or fight to shut bases/businesses down by offering incentives.
It's a dirty job they do, but their every waking moment in politics is, how am I going to get reelected and how much can I do to my constituents to make that happen.
We benefit in some ways but create a swamp in the process.
What do we do now?
And one of the trickiest things is the balance of the fact that in some ways they are right, some they are wrong. Finding where that line is would be like finding El Dorado I think. It'd be awesome though because then people could focus all the time, energy and resource to combating ACTUAL threats to liberties rather than the perceived ones.I’m sure there will always be a fairly large group that will always believe that any election is rigged, no matter what lack of actual evidence there may be. We just have a lot of folks that just want to believe that the “government” is crooked and wants to take all their rights away.
Enter your email address to join: