Does anyone know why the Senate struck the title off SB129? Is it possible that there were a whole lot of them that only wanted to be able to tell the uniformed public that they voted pro gun when they really didn't and will never support the bill with a title? Or was it just some way to allow the house to make more amendments?
Personally, if HB1796 couldn't even get a floor vote I don't see how SB129 will ever get one between Tibbs and Sullivan but I hope I am wrong and will do what I can to help. I have already emailed representative Armes on this but I will make a phone call soon. Does anyone know how the time-line will go on SB129 from here out?
Personally, if HB1796 couldn't even get a floor vote I don't see how SB129 will ever get one between Tibbs and Sullivan but I hope I am wrong and will do what I can to help. I have already emailed representative Armes on this but I will make a phone call soon. Does anyone know how the time-line will go on SB129 from here out?