Unless there were more than one shooters, after the threat is stopped, I will reholster. Thus, if the LEOs come in after that, I will not be seen as the threat.
You willing to bet your life on that?
You willing to bet your life on that?
I don't see where you have much of a choice.
Like Nikat is saying, I'll take my chances (and have) with the police rather than a homicidal suspect.
Train, be armed, be careful and hope for the best. That's about all you can do anytime.
Michael Brown
I don't see where you have much of a choice.
Like Nikat is saying, I'll take my chances (and have) with the police rather than a homicidal suspect.
Train, be armed, be careful and hope for the best. That's about all you can do anytime.
Michael Brown
LE have no reason to EXPECT armed good guys at an active shooter call.
It is a POSSIBILITY and something that will be considered but it is much more incumbant on an unidentifiable armed person to make themselves an obvious non-threat to LE than it is incumbant on LE to expect an armed good guy.
Each party bears some level of responsibility but when I am in plainclothes and armed, I bear the burden of identifying myself and never assume the responding officers will be able to identify me.
I have worked several assignments where I was temporarily unidentifiable to uniformed officers and I can advise that it is freaking nerve-wracking.
I have also responded to plainclothes officers in a struggle with suspects and have slammed the officer nto recognizing who he was so even with almost two decades of experience, I can tell you it's not always obvious who is who.
All I can say is be armed and be careful.
Michael Brown
Question for my ignorance: what is a sap?
Enter your email address to join: