Expensive. I stay with glocks. I know they work every time. I do hate a cheap lousy gun. But I can't afford the best of the best. Ammo costs will blow out of you out of the water.
Anybody who say's "you get what ya pay for" must have hundreds of thousands of dollars in guns. Why would you buy that cheap wilson when could spend acouple thousand more and get a nighthawk custom or something of higher "quality". Why would ya put up with that cheap old crappy benelli when you could drop 100k on a nice set of matched italian shotguns?
I probably have to clarify what a some in this thread talk about. This post is pretty good explaining the mechanics of owning a gun.
There are a lot of really reliable rack guns out there, but they do have a little history of some working good, some having problems.
You don't care what the wood looks like, you want it to go boom every time you fire the trigger. As it should.
If one were in a house with two guns laying on the kitchen table, one being a Kimber/wilson, and the other being a hipoint, and bubba was coming in the door, which gun would you grab first?
The closest loaded one. I'm not picky.
First and foremost, a quality gun is one that works every time. It doesn't matter who made it or what options it has. At 20 feet, it doesn't matter if it shoots 2" groups or 8" groups. They both still hit the target area. Those of you who will chime in that this will clearly miss the head shot are too high speed low drag for your own good.