If we take in refugees, they better be held in refugee camps until we can send them back to wherever they came from. There is no need to allow them to walk the streets, live among us, and spread disease, and improperganda.
Woody
Woody
I don't think Trump means any of this.
A few weeks ago he was saying we had responsibility to take some of the refugees in.
He manufactures controversies to stir the pot and focus the spotlight on him.
It's the red meat he throws out to the base but it shouldn't be taken seriously.
I don't know if you've noticed or not, but Trump is a pompous blowhard.
What?If we take in refugees, they better be held in refugee camps until we can send them back to wherever they came from. There is no need to allow them to walk the streets, live among us, and spread disease, and improperganda.
Woody
What?
I'll happily let some live with me.
What?
I'll happily let some live with me.
I want my very own Muslim refugee!!!
Do they come in female pink? LOL
The stoopid is getting pretty thick these days.
I've got my own religion. It commands me to go to your house, beat your dog, watch your cable, bang your wife and drink your beer. And all of you fawkers that lock your doors are violating my religious freedoms.
So how is that any different than locking these other religious nutsacks out?
I doubt that he meant to do away with trials, and my bet would be that it was just pandering, not ignorance. The death penalty is already on the table for killing Federal LEOs thanks to the "it's a Crime, Bill!" of 1994; about the only thing he could actually do is require Federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty in cases involving the death of a Federale instead of them having prosecutorial discretion.I'm seriously starting to wonder if Trump has the first clue as to how our system of government works. And what's really disconcerting is that a group of people charged with enforcing laws seem to be as clueless as he is.
Enter your email address to join: