Correlation does not imply causation. blah blah blah...
Ferchrissakes, do you even read what people post? or do you just make it up and reply to what you want them to be saying?
Correlation can imply causation, which is why you examine, investigate, test, etc... Correlation is what prompts you to test for causation. You're confusing that with "correlation doesn't equal causation", which is to say that correlation alone is not conclusive.
I'm not saying there's causation. I'm saying there's enough prima facie correlation to warrant investigation. Is that really that hard to understand?