Its pointless to say so, but it's less a matter of someone proving you wrong, and more a matter of you proving yourself right.
I've always taken a person for their word until proven wrong.
Its pointless to say so, but it's less a matter of someone proving you wrong, and more a matter of you proving yourself right.
I am having a heck of a time finding a link. I will find it. I now have a few others that remember it looking too.
His word for what? I'll accept his word for anything he heard around the campfire in 1968. This is a different sort of thing, and Rick needs nobody's protection. He has the interwebz fired-up and he's fixing to regail us with all sorts of feminist literature from the 70's.I've always taken a person for their word until proven wrong.
Lets try this: Rick made an assertion; he was called on it; the evidence provided to support the assertion either tangentially (at best) supports it or is in opposition to it. I'm not saying that he's a liar--or even that he's wrong--just that he hasn't provided sufficient evidence to support his assertion.This whole comment makes absolutely no sense.
Enter your email address to join: