Lets try this: Rick made an assertion; he was called on it; the evidence provided to support the assertion either tangentially (at best) supports it or is in opposition to it. I'm not saying that he's a liar--or even that he's wrong--just that he hasn't provided sufficient evidence to support his assertion.
You were not clear in whom you were accusing of calling him a liar, so I thought I needed to make it clear that I was not, in any way, shape, or form, "ripping" him "for lying."
Rick didn't make an assertstion he repeated a story that he heard in the past, and repeated it. At he time he couldn't find it because of the liberal search engines. BTW, here is a link:
http://cjv123.hubpages.com/hub/Googles-Liberal-Bias
It takes a lot of digging these days when the libs control the media and Internet