Please OSA, tell me I misunderstood the news! Please!

[uncle money bags]

In this particular case, and this case only, Hobbes is not as big a hypocrit "as those he castigates." Give him time. He'll catch up with you guys sooner or later, but not today.

Well played as usual. Ill come back later when he can bring his full effort.

 

[ignerntbend]

O'Neill and Reagan are dead. Neither Bush is President now. .........

I only work with the material I'm given.

 

[JB Books]

Someone needs to tell the petulant, spoiled children NO. And then stand by that decision.
Isnt it about time we have some leaders who will put their official necks on the line for what is right, instead of just saying "yes we can"?

Yes. It's just that they have approached many social issues from a very dogmatic and, frankly, unpleasant position. Consequently, they are pilloried in the media as hate-filled extremists. Moderates, and young voters are turned off.

 

[Dukester]

Yes. It's just that they have approached many social issues from a very dogmatic and, frankly, unpleasant position. Consequently, they are pilloried in the media as hate-filled extremists. Moderates, and young voters are turned off.

That's because low information voters are spoon fed an agenda by the liberal media and they can't be bothered to find out what is true or false for themselves.

 

[inactive]

That's because low information voters are spoon fed an agenda by the liberal media and they can't be bothered to find out what is true or false for themselves.

You think those that sit and let Beck or Limbaugh be systematically be piped into their brains for 6 hours a day are any better?

This goes both ways. Anyone who relies on singular news sources for their information should rightly be called a low information voter. And the biased media is just as pervasive on both sides of the political spectrum.

 

[Spec ops Grunt]

That's because low information voters are spoon fed an agenda by the liberal media and they can't be bothered to find out what is true or false for themselves.

Because the conservative faction of the Republican party isn't anti lgbt? And they have a great record of upholding civil liberties just like the Democrats do?


Frankly anyone that says they support one party needs to think more.

 

[RickN]

You think those that sit and let Beck or Limbaugh be systematically be piped into their brains for 6 hours a day are any better?

This goes both ways. Anyone who relies on singular news sources for their information should rightly be called a low information voter. And the biased media is just as pervasive on both sides of the political spectrum.

I have to agree with this.

As far as Hobbes claiming that the Dems passed a budget this year and wanted a conference committee with the House, did you notice in his link that the Dems said that they refused to work out the differences between the two bills? Yes the Dems sort of passed a budget by avoiding all the hard parts, then gave the House an option of accepting it or nothing.

 

[Hobbes]

That's because low information voters are spoon fed an agenda by the liberal media and they can't be bothered to find out what is true or false for themselves.

So, in your opinion, a person who was unaware that the dems passed a budget this year would be a 'low information voter' if he claimed they didn't?

 

[ignerntbend]

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: Show me a low information voter, and I'll show you a person that doesn't know who won the custody dispute over Anna Nicole's baby.

 

[nofearfactor]

I did get an email from my Rep's office, Markwayne Mullin, Theeeee Red Rooter, that said he was sending his paycheck back to the treasury until this is resolved.
I gotta admire him for that.

He's my rep too. An exceptional fella. Sounds like something he would do. (On a side note, he might not be getting paid by the government, but his company got $207 from me Monday to fix a leaky exterior faucet and pipe).