Oh geeze…. Here we go with the resident Covid “expert” again doubting everyone who didn’t go to the hospital to be treated for the Rona and lived after using ivermectin from the farm and ranch store.
I’m not an expert in anything. But if people are claiming miracle cures, the controlled trials/studies should statistically reflect these miracle cures. I’m open minded, but with several people claiming they had Covid (without even being tested) and were suddenly cured a mere hours after taking animal IVM, it strain’s credibility. I’ve seen docs prescribe human IVM, nothing wrong with that. I’d take it if I had Covid & my doc prescribed it. But these stories don’t prove anything. I looked for the double blind studies. Found a bunch with human IVM but they don’t support these anecdotal stories. Have you found any supporting double blind research using human or animal iVm?
Last edited:
I vote for Robitussin. That tussin can heal bones, cure baldness and clean the teeth of my dog. It's bound to take care of something like COVID. That sounds like a Russian name anyway.
When I first heard them saying antibiotics I agreed with you, but apparently the benefit is two fold if given when appropriate at the appropriate time. I used them when the virus moved into my lungs and it was to prevent getting pneumonia. Also, I "think" they discovered that zpak has an anti-inflammatory effect as a separate benefit. I agree that if someone test positive just taking them for the sake of taking them does no good, but if a doctor that knows that they are doing gives them then I'd take. But I "think:" it was like about 2 weeks into the virus where I started them, can't remember.
I also read something about a person's genes can effect how well ivermectin works for them...some people it is a miracle cure and some like me took it, survived, but still felt terrible for a week or two anyway. I believe the people who say it helped, but I agree there could be people who never even had covid that took it for a common cold thinking it cured their "covid". But there is no denying the antiviral activity based on a variety of information about this long available drug.
Last edited:
The abbot test is over 99% accurate against false positives, but for some of the later strains of covid, it can take 4-6 days after first symptom to give a postive result (meaning it is very likely to give a false negative). But if you have a positive Abbott test, you have the virus.
Folks around these parts were taking the injectable ivermectin orally. I know of several that did it and claimed it worked. I mean obviously they didn’t die but I dunno if they all positively had Covid or not to begin with. I know some were taking ivermectin cuz they believed it may be a preventative for Covid. I know of nobody that was using the paste form. I dunno.
Horseshit Bob
I used the paste. Only difference is dosage with the liguid
Similar threads
