He was asking if anyone was Dick Cheney, not if anyone was a dick.
No this thread originated with real Iraqi WMD and evolved into a discussion about the Iraqi involvement in the attack on OKC. But you get extra points for that nice try at spin.
Also, anyone else remember the warnings about terrorist trying to recruit "Lilly whites" before the attack? Did anyone of you read the FBI report that Nicolas bomb making skills sucked until he went to the Philippines and met with one of the top Muslim bomb makers?
Did you read the article? Did you notice that it was published by the New York Times? Aren't they the liberal bible?
The thread "EVOLVED" when you introduced some stuff about OKC that had nothing to do with the thread.
The New York Times is a newspaper, Terry
I am well aware of that Iggy. But, I'd venture that if any liberals had a bible, it would be the New York Times...
...or any of a dozen other main stream newspapers that lean left in both their coverage and their editorials.
I am a single credible person who endorses this book.
(Waiting for the attack)
No, its all connected. The ME, OKC, 9/11.
go put your blinders back on. This is an adult conversation.
The NYT article in the OP doesn't say jack$hit about a WMD PROGRAM as alleged in the runup to the war.
It describes some old chemical shells that Iraq bought during the Iran/Iraq war, during the Reagan era.
Wrong again. You really should read it before commenting, plus I never said it was about a WMD program, you did. The claims leading to the war was that Saddam had not destroyed all his WMD and was looking to restart, and in some cases had restarted his WMD programs. 400 warheads pretty much proves he did not destroy them and the inspectors reports after the war say he was trying to restart his programs but they could find no evidence he had restarted outside of a bunch of precursor chemicals on hand.
Similar threads
