His speech indicates that he aligns himself with Classic Liberalism along the lines of Jefferson. Neo-Libertarians are Statist Republicans supporting aggressive foreign policy and military domination for the most part with a more casual attitude on social behavior (Neil Boortz is an example).
Boortz can be entertaining, but he does have a streak of Statism. My concern with Paul is that he does not seem to articulate his stance in a compelling manner. When dealing with the un-educated, it is imperative that he make some connection to make the points.