HB2522: Open Carry

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
O

oklacowboy

Guest
I think you are taking the position where the BEST (constitutional carry) is becoming the enemy of the GOOD (conditional open carry).
Current bills are better than what we have now (no open carry).
One small step at a time.
Yes, this right here. Let's get some kind of open carry passed this year. Next year we can work on constitutional carry.
 

hrdware

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
764
Reaction score
2
Location
Moore
So in your opinion, "because that's how we've done it" makes it right?

You'd make a good legislator, since that's their favorite excuse for running the House of Representatives in a manner directly in violation of the Oklahoma Constitution.

Nope, I didn't say that at all. I merely pointed out that the CC permit process currently works the way HB2522 would have the OC permit work. Between the two, I would rather have a like minded private citizen than a government bureaucrat to deal with.
 
U

usaffiremanboyd

Guest
First off, welcome to the forum.

As for an explanation, that's where it gets complicated but I'll try and walk you through it.

There are 2 open carry bills in the legislature this session HB2522 and SB1733. They both started out pretty much the same with regards to open carry. Open carry with a concealed weapons permit, so yes, if you printed or had accidental exposure it wouldn't be a big deal any more. Between the two bills HB2522 was the better bill since it provided additional things, adding ammunition to the parking lot exemption, unlicensed open carry on your own private property, changing the notification to police from "first contact" to "first opportunity", reducing the failure to notify fine. And a couple other things. Both bills passed their house of origin.

When HB2522 got to the Senate Public Safety committee, they completely gutted the bill and inserted language that is closer to constitutional carry. In order to open carry under this language you would have to take a NRA or CLEET level safety course and carry around your certificate of completion. SDA licensees would not be grandfathered in. There is now an amendment to this that would allow SDA instructors to do the same thing.

When SB1733 got to the House Public Safety committee, they did a legislative cut and paste and replaced the entire text with the engrossed version of HB2522 that passed out of the house.

Both bills are now waiting for passage in the opposite chamber and if they pass there, they go back to the chamber of origin for approval of the changes.

The reason I say one bill was gutted and the other replaced text is because HB2522 had completely different language inserted into it while SB1733 had additional language, but the basic idea of the bill was retained.

So, you have probably heard things about both bills and they are correct. It is just a matter of time now to see if one or the other gets passed or if the two go to a conference committee to be reconciled and then voted on. There is still a lot of possibilities left before time runs out.



Thank you very much! Hope it passes!
 

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
I think you are taking the position where the BEST (constitutional carry) is becoming the enemy of the GOOD (conditional open carry).
Current bills are better than what we have now (no open carry).
One small step at a time.

Yes, this right here. Let's get some kind of open carry passed this year. Next year we can work on constitutional carry.

Too small of "baby steps", such as this, tend to not work very well at all. Most people are complacent about letting government control their lives. Many people who argue for "constitutional carry" will have no problem finding another permit as acceptable, much like people have no problem requiring a prescription for a natural substance. I argue that anybody who holds a position in support of any form of permit, licensing, registration, or other documentation to be enemies of the Second Amendment.

The NRA's fine lawyers had two chances to actually defend the Second Amendment in Heller and McDonald. Instead, they chose to expose the Second Amendment to further erosion by refusing to argue that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a natural right and therefore an immunity of being a United States citizen and argued that the Second Amendment granted a "right" to keep and bear arms from the government and is therefore subject to "due process" with existing prohibitions presumed Constitutional unless decided otherwise by the Supreme Court except in the case of a single handgun within a person's home for their self defense inside that home.

Perhaps a better alternative would be to put together an initiative petition to strike the final clause from Article 2 § 26 of the Oklahoma Constitution. After all, as the Oklahoma Constitution currently stands, outright prohibition of bearing arms in a public setting, concealed or unconcealed, without first being summoned by a governmental power, qualifies as "constitutional carry".

Cost of such a petition? ~$250,000 just to get it on the ballot, plus campaigning...
 

David2012

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
1,356
Reaction score
1
Location
Oklahoma
Given the negative anti-open carry comments in the various news articles on the Internet.. I don't think a initiative petition would accomplish a thing and would be a waste of money. As hard as it is to herd the 'Cats' in the legislature into approving Open Carry... doing it with state-wide voters would be much more difficult.
 

Werewolf

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
3,471
Reaction score
7
Location
OKC
Given the negative anti-open carry comments in the various news articles on the Internet.. I don't think a initiative petition would accomplish a thing and would be a waste of money. As hard as it is to herd the 'Cats' in the legislature into approving Open Carry... doing it with state-wide voters would be much more difficult.

I agree. A state wide referendum would be doomed to failure.

The option for that very thing was bandied about in last year's legislative session. A poll was taken (can't find the reference) but at the time something like 73% of Oklahomans were against any type of open carry.

The sheep don't want open carry. They're as happy as sleeping clams in their shells living in a state of oblivion happily living in a world where there are no bad people and even if there are those same bad people won't ever bother them.
 
O

oklacowboy

Guest
Given the negative anti-open carry comments in the various news articles on the Internet.. I don't think a initiative petition would accomplish a thing and would be a waste of money. As hard as it is to herd the 'Cats' in the legislature into approving Open Carry... doing it with state-wide voters would be much more difficult.
It's sad, but this is true.
 

UnSafe

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
2,242
Reaction score
8
Location
Grady Co., OK
First off, welcome to the forum.

As for an explanation, that's where it gets complicated but I'll try and walk you through it.

There are 2 open carry bills in the legislature this session HB2522 and SB1733. They both started out pretty much the same with regards to open carry. Open carry with a concealed weapons permit, so yes, if you printed or had accidental exposure it wouldn't be a big deal any more. Between the two bills HB2522 was the better bill since it provided additional things, adding ammunition to the parking lot exemption, unlicensed open carry on your own private property, changing the notification to police from "first contact" to "first opportunity", reducing the failure to notify fine. And a couple other things. Both bills passed their house of origin.

When HB2522 got to the Senate Public Safety committee, they completely gutted the bill and inserted language that is closer to constitutional carry. In order to open carry under this language you would have to take a NRA or CLEET level safety course and carry around your certificate of completion. SDA licensees would not be grandfathered in. There is now an amendment to this that would allow SDA instructors to do the same thing.

When SB1733 got to the House Public Safety committee, they did a legislative cut and paste and replaced the entire text with the engrossed version of HB2522 that passed out of the house.

Both bills are now waiting for passage in the opposite chamber and if they pass there, they go back to the chamber of origin for approval of the changes.

The reason I say one bill was gutted and the other replaced text is because HB2522 had completely different language inserted into it while SB1733 had additional language, but the basic idea of the bill was retained.

So, you have probably heard things about both bills and they are correct. It is just a matter of time now to see if one or the other gets passed or if the two go to a conference committee to be reconciled and then voted on. There is still a lot of possibilities left before time runs out.

hrdware, thanks for the update. Life has pulled me away from the issue and it's difficult to get updates, other than from here.
 

abajaj11

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
31
Location
Tulsa
Who says it has to be marketed as "open carry"? Essentially, that proposed petition would have little to do with open carry.

Just don't implode like the 744 folks did.
I think the anti 2A folks from all over the country will be quick to point out any proposed legislation if it is about OC. regardless of how it is "marketed".
In my opinion we can't "market" legislation, we just have to be honest about what we want and educate people on past statistics: in this case that 41+ states have some kind of open carry, including several with constitutional carry, and there have not been any adverse effects at all. In fact in many cases there have been beneficial effects.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom